Author Topic: -time 20 VS. debate (Read 247 times)

Spoofy · « **on:** November 16, 2013, 10:58:30 pm »

Quote

The reason why I want to debate about this is because I was opposed by a FULL GAME OF PLAYERS for doing this. Their only reason for wanting -time 20 is because I have a, "disgusting attitude" and that I'm a, "freak."

- tollison

you really are an idiot. its not a flame, its just truth.

1. a full game of players is disagreeing with you, that is 11 other individual opinions. maybe reconsider your thought process?

2. you have a disgusting attitude was not the reason for wanting time 20. It was a versus game, you were red and had game control, your team did 5:40 as sheep. On your wolf turn (reversed), sheep (martin and others) asked for time 20, it was a fair and normal versus. However, you decided to hitler and set time 5:40. Even though time 20 was majority vote and viable. Its the sheeps choice. You said "no", "i dont give a F.U.C.K", "be quiet [insert player name]" etc. I saved the replay for evidence. Do not attempt to lie.

Quote

This is your chance, sheep taggers, to explain why you believe -time 20 is better than setting a time not too far away from the first teams' limit.

- tollison

Its not their chance. Its not debatable. Anyone with a brain can see its an opinion. Take a vote on the forums.

Also, you are never getting red EVER again, I hope you know.

Quote

IF YOU CAN'T TAKE THE HEAT THEN STAY OUT OF THE KITCHEN

- tollison

If you do not understand how to be the game controller, stay out of our games.

Sheep Tag Community

News:

Elder Scrolls

Author Topic: -time 20 VS. debate (Read 247 times)

Spoofy

Re: -time 20 VS. debate

Recent Posts

Shoutbox