Forum > General Discussion

Game Of Thrones

<< < (3/3)

drewisfat:
She knew she was immune to fire. Maybe not that early, but she knew before the burn down the tent incident. She clearly expected to survive that by her speech. But that whole scene was terrible. Her cockiness that both she would survive and that the horselords were doomed was bizarre. It was unrealistic, unbelievably risky, and undermined the amazingness that was her emerging from the flames. The fire spread way too quickly and the horselords didn't even attempt to kill her.... which shouldn't have been hard. She didn't seem serious about the knocking of the fire over at all. 0 rush to burn all of them alive before they could hurt her. Characters often are cocky and stuff as they kill their enemies, and it's even fine for that to be a known character flaw (think Oberyn). But in that scene it just made absolutely no sense and broke any kind of immersion for me.

Celestial_One:
I pretty much completely agree with everything drew said. Cersei has been a crazy psycho **** bad-ass from the get-go.

It doesn't really change the fact that I always look forward to Dany scenes more than Cersei scenes... which kind of influences people to be like WAOW DANY SUPER BADASS!!! DRAGOns WOW!1!! but yeah Dany sucks, lol. Still dunno why they didn't let Dany just be a crazy mad queen and stop counciling her to be a pansy. I mean if Dany wasn't such a back and forth character the series would've ended pretty much as soon as the dragons reached adulthood.

I'm still interested to see how the faceless men and what Jaqen H�ghar are gonna do... I mean if the series plays out with the same happy outlook that the last few episodes have shown then a happy ending might happen.

But if I had to put a wager on the next season I'd say it's going get darker... with shimmers of hope, to be completely struck down in the last episode. Leaving Bran to be the only living(?) creature among the world of undead.

iAMMYOWNSTONE:
meh.. i just dont like cersei because i liked ned stark i guess.. so ive been against her from day one.. but yeah i can see it ending with everyone dying... was talking to someone a while back that thought that the humans were bad for the earth, and that the night king is actually the good guy in all of this.. the dead don't destroy nature..

That being said. I feel like every battle scene has its opposition on either side, just like most of this post is about us arguing on whos "the good guy" .. i feel like they're going to humanize the white walkers before its over, so even they have people on their side rooting for them to win.

Spyffe:
Well i highly doubt the walking dead are neutral for the environment, what will happen for them, when there are no more humans? Will they just live in harmony? I highly doubt it.

From nature's perspective I still think the progress of mankind is a much better longterm solution, because yeh mankind will 99% of the time have war at the start, but will become ever more peaceful with technology.

But I guess I took this very far out on a tangent lol.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page