SamLowe (wbs?) regarding the easy mode, how would you know the answer if you asked the bird that lied? wouldnt it only work if you asked the bird that told the truth?
Asking one bird which door leads to Heaven and then taking the opposite one is the most optimal way of finding it without any hypothesis.Why is this more optimal than just taking the door they told you? Or just ignoring the bird and picking any door? It's 50% anyway, lol..
If you ask which door best reflects their way of speaking then it's an illogical question. Heaven and Hell may or may not be truthful in nature depending on the persons answering this riddle and what the birds believe also. Therefore asking which door holds the afterlife that best reflects their way of speaking and finding the door you want would have to be assumed.Sorry to break it to you, but Heaven and hell don't even exist. The riddle is that we can assume Heaven exists and is associated with truth and Hell exists and is associated with lies (hello John 8:44), as well that the birds are omniscient and speak English.
I start with 50% chance, but If I receive influence from a bird that lies then it would be in my favor to choose the other door. it becomes 2/3 more likely to be the door to heaven opposite of what it says.That's not how it works at all. If you randomly choose, you have a 50% chance. If you ask one of the birds "Which door leads to Heaven," you still have a 50% chance. They don't magically add together (and if they did, it'd be 75%, not 2/3rds).
Ask one of the birds to tell me the door that wouldn't be their answer to the question "Which door leads to heaven?".
can't make a hypothetical statement such as, "which door matches your attribute."That's not a hypothetical statement. "What door would you go to if you died" is.
Your answer to God Slayer mode is. "what door matches your attribute." You have to assume that their attribute matches where the door leads. Heaven and Hell can be either truthful or false. There is no implication in the problem where it says Heaven is a trustworthy place and Hell isn't.The "What door matches your attribute," is the generic question style, not what the question specifically is. I went with it because it was simple/easy to understand. A more proper question would be like: "Your defining trait of lying or truth telling would Biblically match which door?"
If I hear that there is 1 liar of 2 then I don't find that group trustworthy so I'm going to choose the other door.it makes just as much sense to find the group trustworthy and go with whatever door they tell you (there is also 1/2 truthtellers ^^)
Heaven and Hell can be either truthful or false. There is no implication in the problem where it says Heaven is a trustworthy place and Hell isn't.the riddle assumes that you know what heaven and hell stands for in 99.999999999% of litterature, as well as in the minds of 99.99999999% of people who believe in heaven/hell.
Chakra, you're assuming that Heaven is a trustworthy place. It's hypothetical to accept something as truth when you have no proof.
"Your defining trait of lying or truth telling would Biblically match which door?" is also hypothetical. You're assuming the bird knows about all the bibles. The heaven you're trying to go to isn't a specified Heaven. The bird will answer, "What do you mean by biblically" leaving you with no more questions and leaving you to guess which door to open.
Just because 99.99999999% accept Heaven as a trustworthy place doesn't make it factually trustworthy nor should it be implied by reading the riddle. If the riddle is to be answered there should be no misunderstanding of what's going on.
Just because 99.99999999% accept Heaven as a trustworthy place doesn't make it factually trustworthy nor should it be implied by reading the riddle.Everyone else knew what the riddle meant and implied. Heaven doesn't exist; the riddle stipulates it does and that Heaven is associated with truth-telling.
That's what I'm saying what if both the birds think they are telling the truth?They don't.
Chakra, you believe in Heaven.No I don't.
Your life stipulates that it doesWhat is "my life"? Like... those around me? Nope: my entire family is agnostic, as well as a great majority of my friends.
If you break meA classic riddle. Problem is it assumes that the heart can think, thus it's unsolvable!!!!
I do not stop working,
If you touch me
I may be snared,
If you lose me
Nothing will matter.
There are birds that can understand and speak EnglishNo there aren't.
stuff = LCase(InputBox("Speak"))
If InStr(stuff, "heaven") Then
MsgBox("Take the door to your left.")
ElseIf InStr(stuff, "hell") Then
MsgBox("Take the door to your right.")
End If
Ok, so any answer to the riddle would need to include. "If I had a banana in my mouth, I'd need to take it out." Now you have to add EVERY conditional statement that might hinder you, such as having a tomato in your mouth, a chair in the way, etc.No answer to this riddle would need to include what you're talking about. Their understanding of language is an implication; not an assumption.
Or you can just assume nothing is hindering you.You imply nothing is hindering you; not assume.
But whatever, it clearly shows you have ruined the spirit of riddles. Riddles, of course, require assumptions to be answered, just as everything does. The world operates on assumptions, and if we wish to be efficient, we must.
"The spirit of riddles." For an atheist you're very spiritual ^^.****ing retard.
No it doesn't. Their understanding of language is an implication; not an assumption.WtF are you responding to? I said:
Ok, so any answer to the riddle would need to include. "If I had a banana in my mouth, I'd need to take it out." Now you have to add EVERY conditional statement that might hinder you, such as having a tomato in your mouth, a chair in the way, etc.
Or you can just assume nothing is hindering you.
Their understanding of language is an implication; not an assumption.I'm not talking about them understanding English, since you seemed to want to debate that. However, you can't speak at all with a banana in your mouth.
You imply nothing is hindering you; not assume.Nowhere is it implied there isn't a banana in your mouth. Unless you argue otherwise; please, enlighten me where it is implied you don't have a banana in your mouth.
"The spirit of riddles." I didn't know Atheists believe in spirits ^^.Still ****ing retarded.
"The spirit of riddles." For an atheist you're very spiritual ^^.****ing retard.
No it doesn't. Their understanding of language is an implication; not an assumption.WtF are you responding to? I said:
Ok, so any answer to the riddle would need to include. "If I had a banana in my mouth, I'd need to take it out." Now you have to add EVERY conditional statement that might hinder you, such as having a tomato in your mouth, a chair in the way, etc.I already answered this.
Or you can just assume nothing is hindering you.
Their understanding of language is an implication; not an assumption.
I'm not talking about them understanding English, since you seemed to want to debate that. However, you can't speak at all with a banana in your mouth.Trying to speak with a banana in my mouth isn't related to the riddle.
You imply nothing is hindering you; not assume.
Nowhere is it implied there isn't a banana in your mouth. Unless you argue otherwise; please, enlighten me where it is implied you don't have a banana in your mouth.The riddle doesn't mention a banana in my mouth.
"The spirit of riddles." I didn't know Atheists believe in spirits ^^.
Still ****ing retarded.
I'm done with this topic, Tolli doesn't even respond to posts.I have replied many times.
So it is henceforth concluded I answered God-slayer mode of the riddle and Tolli did not, as indicated by everyone but Tolli.I just proved why you were wrong and the only explanation to your proof of answering God-Slayer mode is by assuming everyone but me believes you are right. No one else is posting quality arguments to this thread except you ^^. The quality went downhill once you weren't able to define what you mean logically and resorted to using name calling.
If Ï did I would peel it and share it with the birds.ROFL HOW MUCH OF A **** ARE YOU 1-10 LMAFO;